Rajasthan High Court
CRLMP/5660/2019 of TULSIRAM S/O SHRI RAMNARAYAN KHINCHI B/C KHATIK Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 18 May 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 4899/2020 Anoop Kumar S/o Shri Kishan Swaroop, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Saraswat Sadan, Lane No. 4, Bihari Ganj, Ajmer Raj. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. 2. Alamnoor S/o Najir Khan,
[2026:RJ-JP:20918]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 4899/2020
Anoop Kumar S/o Shri Kishan Swaroop, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Saraswat Sadan, Lane No. 4, Bihari Ganj, Ajmer Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.
2.
Alamnoor S/o Najir Khan, R/o Near Tehsil Bhinay Police Station Bhinay Distt. Ajmer Raj.
----Respondents
Connected With
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 5660/2019
Tulsiram S/o Shri Ramnarayan Khinchi, R/o Bhinai , District Ajmer, Former Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Bhinai, Police Station Bhinai, District Ajmer (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.
2.
Aalamnoor S/o Shri Najeer Khan Bisayati, R/o Tehsil Ke Paas, Police Station Bhinai, District Ajmer (Raj.)
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
None present
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Sudesh Saini, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
18/05/2026
1. Both the criminal miscellaneous petitions have been filed by the petitioners with a prayer to quash FIR No. 130/2012 dated 02.07.2012 at Police Station Bhinai, District Ajmer for offences punishable under Section 420, 419, 465, 467, 468, 471, 477A, 120-B of IPC.
[2026:RJ-JP:20918] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-4899/2020]
2. No one is present on behalf of the petitioners. Earlier also, on 30.10.2025 and 06.05.2026 when the case was called for hearing, no one appeared for the petitioners.
3. The allegations against the petitioners in the impugned First Information Report are of preparing forged documents regarding muster rolls and payments i.e. either in cash or by distribution of wheat coupons.
4. It has been averred in the memo of the petition that the allegations against the petitioners are false and fabricated.
5. Looking to the allegations made in the First Information Report, this Court at this stage cannot held that the allegations against the petitioners are false and fabricated, without there being any proper investigation based on the relevant documents.
6. After going through the allegation made in the First Information Report against the petitioners, this Court feels that this is not a fit case to exercise inherent jurisdiction to quash the FIR.
7. Accordingly, both the criminal miscellaneous petitions are dismissed.
8. The stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J 49-50/SHRUTI SHARMA