Rajasthan High Court
CW/8849/2026 of PROF. RITA MEHRA D/O LATE SHRI S.N. MEHRA Vs MAHARSHI DAYANAND SARASWATI UNIVERSITY on 18 May 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8849/2026 Prof. Rita Mehra D/o Late Shri S.n. Mehra, Aged About 60 Years, Resident Of D-5, Madhuban Colony, Naka Madar, Ajmer-305007 ----Petitioner Versus 1. Maharshi Dayanand Saraswati University, Ajmer Through Its Registrar
[2026:RJ-JP:20823]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8849/2026
Prof. Rita Mehra D/o Late Shri S.n. Mehra, Aged About 60 Years, Resident Of D-5, Madhuban Colony, Naka Madar, Ajmer-305007
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
Maharshi Dayanand Saraswati University, Ajmer Through Its Registrar
2.
Prof. Suresh Kumar Agrawal, Vice Chancellor, Maharshi Dayanand Saraswati University, Ajmer
3.
Ms. Neha Sharma, Comptroller Mds University, Ajmer
4.
Professor Shiv Prasad, Director Malviya Mission Teachers Training Centre (M.m.t.t.c.), Maharshi Dayanand Saraswati University, Ajmer
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Tanveer Ahamad
For Respondent(s)
:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
18/05/2026
1. By means of filing instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner seeks to impugn the show- cause notice dated 01.05.2026.
2. Vide impugned show-cause notice dated 01.05.2026, petitioner has been asked to submit a written explanation within three days from the date of receipt thereof, clearly explaining as to why disciplinary action should not be initiated against her. Admittedly, till date, no disciplinary action has been initiated against the petitioner. Therefore, petitioner cannot be said to be aggrieved merely by issuance of the show-cause notice.
3. Counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner has prayed to provide certain documents/ information to respond the show-
[2026:RJ-JP:20823] (2 of 2) [CW-8849/2026] cause notice, which have not been made available by respondents. In this aspect, petitioner is at liberty to pursue her prayer before respondents in accordance with law.
4. At this stage, counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the instant writ petition with liberty to file afresh, in case any disciplinary action is initiated against the petitioner, maliciously or without following the due process of law.
5. Permission is granted.
6. Accordingly, with the aforesaid observations, the instant writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for.
7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J Sachin Sharma/4