Rajasthan High Court
CRLMP/469/2016 of BIJENDRA @ NAKTA Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN THROUGH PP on 18 May 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 469/2016 Bijendra @ Nakta, S/o Shri Chhiddu, R/o Bagdhar, PS- Baseri, Tehsil Baseri, District- Dholpur, Rajasthan. ----Accused/Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor
[2026:RJ-JP:20802]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 469/2016
Bijendra @ Nakta, S/o Shri Chhiddu, R/o Bagdhar, PS- Baseri, Tehsil Baseri, District- Dholpur, Rajasthan.
----Accused/Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor
----Respondent/Non-Petitioner
For Petitioner(s)
:
None present
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Sudesh Saini, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
18/05/2026
1. The instant criminal misc. petition has been filed by the petitioner with a challenge to the order dated 24.11.2015 passed by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bari, District Dholpur, in Criminal Revision Petition No.14/2015, whereby the revision petition filed by the petitioner was dismissed and so also the order dated 04.03.2015 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Bari, District Dholpur, whereby the cognizance has been taken against the petitioner for offence punishable under Sections 326 and 302 of IPC.
2. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. Earlier also, on 08.05.2026 and 01.05.2026, when the case was called for hearing, no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
[2026:RJ-JP:20802] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-469/2016]
3. Vide order dated 01.05.2026, the learned Public Prosecutor was directed to call for the present status of the trial of the criminal case.
4. The learned Public Prosecutor has placed before this Court the present status report of the criminal case received from the S.H.O., Police Station Baseri, District Dholpur, which is taken on record.
5. As per the status report, the accused-petitioner has been acquitted from the criminal charges.
6. In view of the fact that in the criminal case, the accused-petitioner has already been acquitted by the learned Trial Court, no further cause of action survives with the petitioner.
7. Accordingly, this criminal misc. petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
8. The stay application and pending application, if any, also stand disposed of. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /15