Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/6674/2026 of TOUFIK S/O BASIR Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 13 May 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6674/2026 Toufik S/o Basir, R/o Kayra Ki Dhani Gwalda, Police Station Chopanki, District Khairthal Tijara, Rajasthan. (At Present Accused- Petitioner Confined In Bhiwadi, District Khairthal- Tijara)
[2026:RJ-JP:20165]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6674/2026
Toufik S/o Basir, R/o Kayra Ki Dhani Gwalda, Police Station Chopanki, District Khairthal Tijara, Rajasthan. (At Present Accused- Petitioner Confined In Bhiwadi, District Khairthal- Tijara)
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan, through P.P.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Jiya Ur Rahman
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
13/05/2026
1. The present bail application has been filed by the accused- petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No.66/2026 registered at Police Station Choupanki, District Bhiwadi for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 3, 5 and 8 of Rajasthan Bovine Animal (Prohibition of Slaughter and Regulation of Temporary Migration or Export) Act, 1995 (for short ‘the Act of, 1995’) and Section(s) 4/25 of Arms Act.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he has nothing to do with the alleged offences. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 03.04.2026. Learned counsel also submits that offence under Section 3 of the Act of, 1995 is not attracted against the petitioner and trial will take considerably long time in its conclusion, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the
[2026:RJ-JP:20165] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-6674/2026] petitioner in custody, and therefore prays to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner hereinabove.
4. Taking into consideration the overall facts & circumstances of the case; the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, the fact that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent; he is in custody since 03.04.2026 and trial will take considerably long time in its conclusion, but without commenting anything upon the merits/demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
5. Therefore, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and the accused-petitioner, namely Toufik S/o Basir, is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J AVINASH GULERIA /17