Rajasthan High Court
SAW/399/2026 of RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION Vs PRADEEP GUPTA S/O SHRI SUBHASH CHAND GUPTA on 12 May 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No. 399/2026 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5490/2026 1. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Through Its Managing Director, Transport Bhawan, Parivahan Marg, Jaipur. 2. The Executive Director (Traffic), Rajasthan
[2026:RJ-JP:19978-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No. 399/2026
In
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5490/2026
1.
Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Through Its Managing Director, Transport Bhawan, Parivahan Marg, Jaipur.
2.
The Executive Director (Traffic), Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Transport Bhawan, Parivahan Marg, Jaipur (Raj.)
3.
The Deputy General Manager (Administration), Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation Headquarters, Parivahan Marg, Jaipur (Raj.).
4.
The Chief Depot Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Dholpur Depot, District-Dholpur (Raj.
----Appellants
Versus
Pradeep Gupta S/o Shri Subhash Chand Gupta, Aged About 40
Years, R/o 224 Bhamatipura, Distt. Dholpur (Raj.).
----Respondent
For Appellant(s)
:
Mr. R.N. Mathur, Sr. Adv. assisted by
Mr. Kapil Sharma
For Respondent(s)
:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
12/05/2026
1. The appeal has been filed by and on behalf of Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation (RSRTC), impugning the order dated 27.03.2026 passed by learned Single Judge in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5490/2026, quashing the order dated 16.01.2026 passed by the Executive Officer (Traffic), RSRTC and remanding
[2026:RJ-JP:19978-DB] (2 of 2) [SAW-399/2026] the issue of placing the respondent/original writ petitioner on suspension arbitrarily to consider afresh by the Managing Director, RSRTC.
2. Learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of RSRTC submits that the order of suspension of respondent/original writ petitioner dated 28.10.2025 has been revoked by the Corporation itself vide subsequent order dated 28.11.2025. In that view, any detailed or reasonable order was not required to be passed, hence, the order dated 16.01.2026 was not required to be interferred with by the learned Single Judge and the impugned order warrant interference.
3. Having argued the appeal at length, learned Senior Counsel does not dispute that the legality and validity of the order of suspension dated 28.10.2025, placing the respondent/original writ petitioner on suspension, can yet be re-looked/examined by the Managing Director, RSRTC, therefore, the order of learned Single Judge is not deterimental to the interest of RSRTC, hence, he does not press this appeal to this extent, however, prays a liberty to file a fresh appeal, by and on behalf of Dr. Jyoti Chauhan the then Executive Officer (Traffic) in her personal and official capacity, to question/challenge the adverse findings recorded against her by the learned Single Judge in the impugned order.
4. In view of the above, instant appeal is disposed of with liberty, as prayed for.
5. All pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(MANEESH SHARMA),J (SUDESH BANSAL),J DEEPA-5