Rajasthan High Court
CRLMP/6313/2017 of RANJEET BIRANI Vs STATE OF RAJ AND ANR on 12 May 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6313/2017 Ranjeet Birani S/o Shri Ratan Lal Birani, R/o Birani James, 2289, Ram Lala Ji Ka Rasta, Johri Bazar, Jaipur Raj. Through Power Of Attorney Holder Shri Manoj Kakkad S/o Shri Kakkad R/o House No. 3-D-3,
[2026:RJ-JP:20114]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6313/2017
Ranjeet Birani S/o Shri Ratan Lal Birani, R/o Birani James, 2289, Ram Lala Ji Ka Rasta, Johri Bazar, Jaipur Raj. Through Power Of Attorney Holder Shri Manoj Kakkad S/o Shri Kakkad R/o House No. 3-D-3, Jawahar Nagar, Jaipur Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
State Of Rajasthan Through P.P.
2.
Saurabh Jain S/o Shri Shanti Kumar Singhi, R/o House No. 1722, Jadiyau Ka Rasta, Choura Rasta, Jaipur City.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Naman Yadav
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
12/05/2026 This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed by the petitioner with a challenge to order dated 03.03.2015 passed by the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate No.4, Jaipur Metropolitan, Jaipur as regards the interim custody of the seized articles. Counsel for the petitioner states that after passing of the impugned order dated 03.03.2015, the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate No.11, Jaipur Metropolitan-II vide its judgment dated 07.10.2025 has acquitted the accused and passed the order regarding the seized articles that the same shall remain with the complainant to whom the interim custody was given.
[2026:RJ-JP:20114] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-6313/2017] In view of the fact that final judgment in the criminal case has been passed by the learned trial Court as regards the acquittal of the accused and so also the custody of the seized articles, therefore, the present criminal misc. petition filed for interim custody of the seized articles has become infructuous. In view of the opinion of this Court, the present criminal misc. petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. The petitioner at liberty to avail the appropriate remedy if he is agreed by the final order dated 07.10.2025 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.11, Jaipur Metropolitan-II. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J PRATEEK/29