Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/5797/2026 of ZAHID S/O SHABBIR Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 6 May 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5797/2026 Zahid S/o Shabbir, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Mamolka Mangorka, Police Station Hathin, District Palwal (Haryana) (Presently Confined In District Jail At Jhalawar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of
[2026:RJ-JP:19139]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5797/2026
Zahid S/o Shabbir, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Mamolka Mangorka, Police Station Hathin, District Palwal (Haryana)
(Presently Confined In District Jail At Jhalawar).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
Connected With
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6187/2026
Mohammed Rafakat S/o Mohammed Rahmuddin, Aged About 27
Years, R/o Adbar, Police Station Nuh, District Nuh (Haryana)
(Presently Confined In District Jail At Jhalawar).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Rajveer Singh Jhala
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
06/05/2026
1. These bail applications have been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioners under Section 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No.57/2026 registered at Police Station Jhalrapatan, District Jhalawar for the offences under Sections 19/54, 54(A) of the Rajasthan Excise Act, 1950.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and they have nothing to do with the alleged offences. Learned counsel further submits that the offences are triable by Court of Magistrate; petitioners have no
[2026:RJ-JP:19139] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5797/2026] criminal antecedents, they are in custody since 01.03.2026 and investigation and trial will take considerably long time in conclusion, so no fruitful purpose would be served by them in custody, and therefore, prays that petitioners may be granted benefit of bail.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners hereinabove.
4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, as also the facts that offences are triable by Court of Magistrate, petitioners are in custody sine long and investigation and trial will take considerably long time in conclusion, but without commenting anything on merits / demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail.
5. Therefore, these bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are allowed and the accused-petitioners (1) Zahid S/o Shabbir and (2) Mohammed Rafakat S/o Mohammed Rahmuddin are ordered to be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J TN/9-10