Rajasthan High Court
WMAP/178/2026 of DEEPTI CHINARIA DAUGHTER OF SHRI VINOD KUMAR CHINARIA Vs AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED on 6 May 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Writ Miscellaneous Application No. 178/2026 Deepti Chinaria Daughter Of Shri Vinod Kumar Chinaria, Aged About 44 Years, Informatics Assistant, Office Of Zonal Chief Engineer (Ajmer Zone), Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Panchsheel Nagar, Ajmer And
[2026:RJ-JP:19066-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Writ Miscellaneous Application No. 178/2026
Deepti Chinaria Daughter Of Shri Vinod Kumar Chinaria, Aged About 44 Years, Informatics Assistant, Office Of Zonal Chief Engineer (Ajmer Zone), Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Panchsheel Nagar, Ajmer And Resident Of House No. 96/28-A, Hariom Marg, Bhajan Ganj, Ajmer.
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Vidyut Bhawan, Panchsheel Nagar, Makadwali Road, Ajmer - 305004
Through Its Managing Director.
2.
The Secretary (Admn.), Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Vidyut Bhawan, Panchsheel Nagar, Makadwali Road, Ajmer 305004.
3.
Mr. Sunil Kumar Chaturvedi, Office Of Executive Engineer (M And P), Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Bhilwara.
4.
Ramesh Kumar Son Of Shri Roop Singh, Aged About 45
Years, Resident Of 111, Narsingh Vihar, Gokulpura, Kalwar Road, Jaipur- 302012.
5.
Neelima Gupta Wife Of Shri Umesh Mittal, Aged About 44
Years, R/o 49-B, Hbu Nagar-Ext, Pushkar Road, Ajmer.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Abhishek Sharma
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Ashish Kishore Saxena with
Mr. Harshit Mittal
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
06/05/2026
1. The present misc. application has been filed by the applicant- AVVNL seeking clarification in the order dated 10.03.2026 passed by this Court in D.B S.A.W No.205/2026.
[2026:RJ-JP:19066-DB] (2 of 2) [WMAP-178/2026]
2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that in view of the observations made by this Court in Para No.8 of the impugned order, a clarification has been prayed for in the manner that as to whether the result of the entire DPC in question is required to be kept in sealed cover, or only the result pertaining to the candidate in question i.e. appellant is to be kept in sealed cover.
3. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
4. This Court finds that although in Para No.8 itself, it is specifically mentioned that the result of the DPC shall be kept in a sealed cover, which clearly implies that only the result of the candidate in question i.e. appellant is to be kept in sealed cover, however, in the interest of justice, the present misc. application is disposed of with a clarification that the DPC in question shall be conducted, but the result of the candidate in question i.e. appellant alone shall be kept in sealed cover. (VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J (PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J 8-Diksha Mishra/-