Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/6370/2026 of PRAHLAD S/O MANGLA RAM Vs THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 6 May 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Second Bail Application No. 6370/2026 Prahlad S/o Mangla Ram, R/o Village Renpura, Police Station Masooda, District Ajmer (Raj.) (At Present In Central Jail Ajmer). ----Accused/Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan,
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Second Bail Application No.
6370/2026
Prahlad S/o Mangla Ram, R/o Village Renpura, Police Station Masooda, District Ajmer (Raj.)
(At Present In Central Jail Ajmer).
----Accused/Petitioner
Versus
1.
The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
…..Respondent
2.
Dinesh Kumar, S.H.O. Police Station Masuda, District Ajmer (Raj.)
----Complainant/Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Rajeev Kumar Sogarwal along
with
Mr. Hitesh Haritwal and
Ms. Ayushi Choudhary
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Amit Poonia, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
06/05/2026
1. The accused-petitioner has filed this second bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. arising out of F.I.R. No.125/2023 registered with the Police Station Masooda, District Ajmer for offence under Sections 302 and 201 I.P.C.
2. Heard.
3. Considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the accused-petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material made available on record.
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-6370/2026]
4. As per the facts on record, the accused-petitioner is said to be in custody since 10.04.2023 and the only evidence, so as to connect him with the alleged crime, is that there is a recovery of Pant worn by him, which is said to have blood stains on it.
5. As per the learned Public Prosecutor, the sample of the blood, found on the pant worn by the petitioner, has been sent to the FSL, but no report in this regard has been received so far. The accused-petitioner is in custody since 10.04.2026 and till date, nineteen witnesses have been examined, however, the complainant party has moved an application for recalling the witnesses.
6. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the complainant party itself is delaying the conclusion of the trial.
7. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and so also the fact that the petitioner is in custody for last more than three years, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
8. Accordingly, this second bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any other Court to which the matter is transferred,
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-6370/2026] on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /4