Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/3623/2026 of PAVAN SINGH S/O SHRI SHAITAN SINGH Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 6 May 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3623/2026 Pavan Singh S/o Shri Shaitan Singh, aged about 24 Years, R/o Village Ghat, Police Station Bansur, District Kotputli-Behror (Raj.). (at present confined in District Jail-Kotputli-Behror)
[2026:RJ-JP:19082]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3623/2026
Pavan Singh S/o Shri Shaitan Singh, aged about 24 Years, R/o Village Ghat, Police Station Bansur, District Kotputli-Behror (Raj.). (at present confined in District Jail-Kotputli-Behror)
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan, through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Gaurav Gupta
For Respondent(s)
For Complainant(s)
:
:
Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP
Mr. Manish K. Sharma
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
06/05/2026
1. The present bail application has been filed by the accused- petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No.662/2022 registered at Police Station Behror, District Bhiwadi, for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 419, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he has nothing to do with the alleged offences. Learned counsel further submits that name of the petitioner has not been mentioned in the FIR and he has never executed any agreement in favour of the complainant. However, the only allegation against the petitioner is that he received a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- from the complainant. Learned counsel also submits that other co-accused of this case namely, Ranveer Singh, Tikam Singh, Pitamber Singh, Rohit Sharma @ Chinki, Gyarsilal, Narendra Singh, Sumarjeet,
[2026:RJ-JP:19082] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3623/2026] Satyaveer Singh, Mukesh Rajput and Yashveer @ Chhuttan, have already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Benches of this Court. He also submits that, after conclusion of investigation, charge-sheet has been filed in the matter, the petitioner is in custody since 24.01.2026 and conclusion of trial will take considerably long time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner into custody, and therefore prays to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant oppose the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner hereinabove.
4. Taking into consideration the overall facts & circumstances of the case; the arguments advanced by learned counsel for both the parties; the facts that the co-accused have been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Benches of this Court, charge-sheet has already been filed, petitioner is in custody since long and trial will take considerably long time in its conclusion, thus, without commenting anything upon the merits / demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
5. Therefore, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and the accused-petitioner, namely Pavan Singh S/o Shri Shaitan Singh, is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J AVINASH GULERIA /5