Rajasthan High Court

CRLMP/3063/2019 of MONU @ BHAG CHAND S/O LATE SHRI CHAND MAL SAINI Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 6 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3063/2019 Monu @ Bhag Chand S/o Late Shri Chand Mal Saini, R/o Peer Ka Kuwa, Sambhar Lake, District Jaipur. ----Petitioner/Accused Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : None

[2026:RJ-JP:19242]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3063/2019

Monu @ Bhag Chand S/o Late Shri Chand Mal Saini, R/o Peer Ka Kuwa, Sambhar Lake, District Jaipur.

----Petitioner/Accused

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP.

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)

:

None present

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Amit Poonia, P.P.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

06/05/2026

1. This criminal misc. petition has been filed by the accused-petitioner under Section 482 Cr.P.C. with a challenge to the order dated 30.04.2019 passed by the learned Special Judge, Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereinafter to be referred to as ‘the Act of 2012’), to the extent of summoning the witnesses on submitting process fees and summons and to pay Rs.2000/- per witness.

2. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the accused- petitioner.

3. The impugned order has been passed on 30.04.2019 and there is no interim order from this Court.

4. On going through the impugned order, the other material and so also the averments made in the memo of the petition, this Court finds no ground to invoke its inherent jurisdiction.

[2026:RJ-JP:19242] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-3063/2019]

5. Accordingly, this criminal misc. petition filed by the accused-petitioner is dismissed.

6. Since the main petition has been dismissed, the stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /7

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead