Rajasthan High Court
CW/17118/2025 of RAMPAL S/O SH. RAMNIWAS YADAV, Vs THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 5 May 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17118/2025 Rampal S/o Sh. Ramniwas Yadav, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Village Shyodansinghpura, Gram Panchayat Khohar, Tehsil Behror, District Kotputli-Behror, Rajasthan (Aadhaar No. 5987 8302 6972) (Pan No. Cafpr6017M) Mobile
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17118/2025
Rampal S/o Sh. Ramniwas Yadav, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Village Shyodansinghpura, Gram Panchayat Khohar, Tehsil Behror, District Kotputli-Behror, Rajasthan (Aadhaar No. 5987
8302 6972) (Pan No. Cafpr6017M) Mobile No. 9057843707
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2.
The Collector And District Magistrate Cum Chairman, Plpc, District Kotputli-Behror, Rajasthan.
3.
The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Alwar, Rajasthan.
4.
The Sub Divisional Officer, Behror, District Kotputli-Bheror, Rajasthan.
5.
The Tehsildar, Tehsil Behror, District Kotputli-Behror, Rajasthan.
6.
The Development Officer, Panchayatsamiti, Behror, District Kotputli-Behror, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary with
Mr. Himanshu
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. G.S. Gill, AAG with
Ms. Rashmi Kaushik and
Mr. Dev Kumar
Mr. Anil Kumar Sharma
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
05/05/2026
1. The present writ petition has been filed with the following prayers: “i) By an appropriate writ or order or direction or in nature thereof direct the respondents to inspect the
(2 of 2) [CW-17118/2025] spot and identify the land which is alleged to be charagah land and being used for construction of interlocking road. ii) Respondents may kindly be further directed that depending upon the spot inspection report, if it is found that it is a land of charagah, the respondent authority shall issue necessary direction in this regard and if it is found as Aabadi land then work of interlocking is done within time iii) Respondent may kindly be further directed the authority sanction and financial sanction will not be cancelled. iv) Any other appropriate writ, order or direction which this Hon’ble High Court may consider just a proper may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner. v) Cost or this writ petition (PIL) may also kindly be awarded in favour of the petitioner”
2. At the outset, Mr. G.S. Gill, learned Additional Advocate General submits that most of the encroachments have already been removed and the State is committed to remove all remaining encroachments. The compliance report with respect to the same is already on record.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner is satisfied with such statement as well as the compliance report.
4. In light of the compliance report and the submissions made by learned AAG, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the State to act strictly in accordance with the compliance report.
5. All pending applications, including I.A. No. 1/2026 seeking impleadment of the applicant as respondent No. 6, are accordingly disposed of. (VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J (DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J Diksha Mishra/7