Rajasthan High Court

CRLMB/5593/2026 of DANI GURJAR ALIAS DAN SINGH S/O SHRI BANSO SINGH Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 28 April 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5593/2026 Dani Gurjar Alias Dan Singh S/o Shri Banso Singh, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Village Beru, Police Station Sikri, District Deeg, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

[2026:RJ-JP:18001]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

5593/2026

Dani Gurjar Alias Dan Singh S/o Shri Banso Singh, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Village Beru, Police Station Sikri, District Deeg, Rajasthan.

----Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Arafat Hussain

For Respondent(s)

:

Ms. Aarti Sharma, P.P.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

28/04/2026

1. This anticipatory bail application under Section 482 B.N.S.S. has been filed by the petitioner in connection with F.I.R. No.486/2024, registered with the Police Station Kanota, District Jaipur City (East), for the offence punishable under Sections 8 and 20 of the NDPS Act.

2. Heard.

3. Considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the factual report submitted by the learned Public Prosecutor.

4. As per the contents of the F.I.R., during search, the contraband, Ganja, weighing 10.850 kg, was recovered from the possession of co-accused, Sonu Singh. In the statement of co- accused, Sonu Singh, he has deposed that he purchased the said

[2026:RJ-JP:18001] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5593/2026] contraband from the present petitioner. It has been submitted by the learned Public Prosecutor that there is regular call conversation in between the accused-petitioner and co-accused, Sonu Singh, from whose possession the alleged contraband has been recovered.

5. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and so also the statement of co- accused, which as per the settled law, cannot be discarded without there being any otherwise evidence and there is regular call conversation in between the petitioner and co-accused, which prima facie speaks of connectivity of the accused petitioner with the recovered contraband, this Court is not inclined to extend the benefit of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, the present anticipatory bail application filed by the petitioner is dismissed. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /40

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead