YOGITA SHARMA vs FINOVA CAPITAL VT LIMITED on 19 June 2025

Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur * Item No. 4 Case No. MA/82/2025 IN SA/800/2022 YOGITA SHARMA Vs FINOVA CAPITAL VT LIMITED Date: 19.06.2025. Proceedings through hybrid mode Present: Shri Kirti Kapoor & Sh. Bhrigu Sharma, Counsel for the Applicant along with Ms. Yogita Sharma Shri Akshat Kulshreshtha, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI This Misc. Application is moved by the Yogita Sharma who had withdrawn the earlier SA and request is now being made for restoration of the SA in view of the specific development. She is present in person and explains the reasons for withdrawing the Securitization Application. Counsel for the applicant on instructions submits that she was under duress and under tremendous pressure & stress because of actions of auction purchaser and bank officers. The counsel who appears for the respondent FI submits that there was no pressure which can be termed as illegal stress being extorted on the applicant as officers were doing their own duty. The applicant is a practicing advocate and she owns her statement. The Tribunal believes that statement made by her at Bar is correct statement and it might be possible that finally the respondent might have gone little over board. Any steps taken in duress or wrong information can be termed as information non-est in the eyes of law. Counsel for the respondent bank submits that in view of the averments in Misc. Application, he leaves it to the Court to condone the delay and restore the SA. Accordingly, looking into the facts and power conferred upon this Tribunal under Section 17(7) of Securitization Act read with Section 19 (25) of RDB Act, this Misc. Application stands allowed and Securitization Application stands restored on its original number. Securitization Application be listed on 24.06.2025. File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.

Court of the Presiding Officer

* DASTI (Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer