Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/4650/2026 of RAGHUNANDAN S/O OMPRAKASH KUMHAR Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 27 April 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4650/2026 Raghunandan S/o Omprakash Kumhar, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Kharkhada Ramlothan, P/s Mothpur, District Baran (Raj.) (Ac- cused Presently Confined In Sub Jail Atru District Baran). ----Petitioner
[2026:RJ-JP:17724]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.
4650/2026
Raghunandan S/o Omprakash Kumhar, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Kharkhada Ramlothan, P/s Mothpur, District Baran (Raj.) (Ac- cused Presently Confined In Sub Jail Atru District Baran).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Bhim Singh Meena
For Respondent(s)
:
Ms. Aarti Sharma, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
27/04/2026
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioner in connection with FIR No. 56/2026 registered at Police Station Atru, District Baran for offence under Sections 8, 20 of the N.D.P.S. Act 1985.
2. Heard.
3. Considered the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor.
4. The allegation against the accused-petitioner is that he provided the alleged contraband i.e. 8.403 kg. Ganja to the co-accused 'Rakesh Meena' from whose possession it was recovered. The accused-petitioner is in custody since 28.02.2026 and co-accused from whose possession contraband has been recovered has been enlarged on bail by a separate order.
[2026:RJ-JP:17724] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4650/2026]
5. The accused-petitioner has been made an accused on the basis of the statements of the co-accused with the aid of Section 8/29 of the N.D.P.S. Act.
6. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
7. Accordingly, the present bail application is allowed and it is directed that the accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided that he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lax Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/-(Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
8. However, it is made clear that in case the accused- petitioner is found to be involved in any other criminal case of similar nature in future, the prosecution would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of this bail order. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J SHRUTI SHARMA /39