Rajasthan High Court

CRLMB/4671/2026 of BHIVARAM @ DEVA GURJAR S/O SADHURAM GURJAR Vs THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 22 April 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4671/2026 Bhivaram @ Deva Gurjar S/o Sadhuram Gurjar, Resident Of Joda Ki Dhani Ward No. 11 Dev Ka Harmada Jaipur ( Accused Petitioner Is In Judicial Custody In Sub Jail Shahpura District Jaipur )

[2026:RJ-JP:16980]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

4671/2026

Bhivaram @ Deva Gurjar S/o Sadhuram Gurjar, Resident Of Joda Ki Dhani Ward No. 11 Dev Ka Harmada Jaipur ( Accused Petitioner Is In Judicial Custody In Sub Jail Shahpura District Jaipur )

----Petitioner

Versus

The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Manish Gupta

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, P.P.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

22/04/2026

1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioner in connection with FIR No. 63/2026 registered at Police Station Manoharpur, District Jaipur Rural for offence under Sections 8, 21, 22 of the N.D.P.S. Act 1985.

2. Heard.

3. Considered the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor.

4. The allegation against the accused-petitioner is that he provided the alleged contraband i.e. 25.20 gram Tramadol to the co-accused 'Dasrath' from whose possession it was recovered. The accused-petitioner is in custody since 13.03.2026.

[2026:RJ-JP:16980] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4671/2026]

5. The accused-petitioner has been made an accused on the basis of the statement of the co-accused with the aid of Section 8/29 of the N.D.P.S. Act.

6. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.

7. Accordingly, the present bail application is allowed and it is directed that the accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided that he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lax Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/-(Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

8. However, it is made clear that in case the accused- petitioner is found to be involved in any other criminal case of similar nature in future, the prosecution would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of this bail order. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J SHRUTI SHARMA /34

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead