Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/5974/2026 of KOMAL SANSI D/O SHRI DHANNA SANSI Vs THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 22 April 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5974/2026 Komal Sansi D/o Shri Dhanna Sansi, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Block No. 111, Quarter No. 03, Rajiv Awas Yojna, Bagrana, Police Station Kanota, District Jaipur East. (At Present Confined At Mahila
[2026:RJ-JP:17043]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5974/2026
Komal Sansi D/o Shri Dhanna Sansi, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Block No. 111, Quarter No. 03, Rajiv Awas Yojna, Bagrana, Police Station Kanota, District Jaipur East. (At Present Confined At Mahila Jail, Jaipur).
----Petitioner
Versus
The State of Rajasthan, through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Girraj P. Sharma
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. S.R. Dhakad, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
22/04/2026
1. This bail application has been filed by the accused petitioner u/S 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 874/2025 registered at Police Station Kanota, District Jaipur City (East) for offence u/S 8/21 of the NDPS Act.
2. Heard.
3. Considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the challan papers.
4. As per the prosecution, the allegation against the accused petitioner is that 5.50 gm. of illegal drug smack was said to have been recovered from the possession of the co-accused Raju @ Rajjo who is said to have brought the said drug from the present petitioner. The accused petitioner is in custody since 06.04.2026 and the co-accused named above from whose possession the
[2026:RJ-JP:17043] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5974/2026] alleged contraband has been recovered have already been enlarged on bail.
5. In criminal jurisprudence, the statement of an accused solely cannot be made the basis for conviction of other accused persons.
6. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and more particularly the fact that the accused petitioner has been implicated in this criminal case with the aid of Section 8/29 of the NDPS Act and the co-accused Raju @ Rajjo from whose possession the alleged contraband was recovered, have already been enlarged on bail, this Court, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of this case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail
7. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided that she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that she shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
8. In case the accused-petitioner is found to be involved in any other criminal case of similar nature in future, the prosecution may move application for cancellation of his bail. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava /76