Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/5115/2026 of MEERA DEVI W/O MAMRAJ Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 22 April 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5115/2026 Meera Devi W/o Mamraj, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Bhuri Dungari Tan Badaganv P.s. Basdayal Tehsil Narayanpur District Kotaputli Behror. ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.
5115/2026
Meera Devi W/o Mamraj, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Bhuri Dungari Tan Badaganv P.s. Basdayal Tehsil Narayanpur District Kotaputli Behror.
----Accused-Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Jai Raj Tantia
For Respondent(s)
:
Ms. Aarti Sharma, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
22/04/2026
1. The petitioner has filed this anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of B.N.S.S. arising out of F.I.R. No.154/2025 registered with the Police Station, Basdayal, District kotputli- Behror, for offence under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 324(4), 125 of B.N.S., 2023.
2. Heard.
3. Considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor and so also perused the case diary.
4. As per the facts on record, F.I.R. No.154/2025 has been lodged by the complainant party with the allegation against 25 persons of making attack on them while they were in the agricultural field.
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-5115/2026]
5. On a query put by the Court to the learned Public Prosecutor, she stated that though total seven persons were injured from the complainant side, however, all the injuries sustained by the injured persons are found to be simple in nature.
6. As per the contents of the F.I.R., no overt act has been assigned to the petitioner and she is a woman.
7. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, more particularly the fact that no specific overt act has been assigned to the petitioner in the F.I.R. and the petitioner is a woman, this Court deems just and proper to extend the benefit of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
8. The Anticipatory Bail Application is allowed. The S.H.O./I.O./Arresting Authority, Police Station Basdayal, District Kotputli- Behror, in F.I.R. No. 154/2025 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner, she shall be released on bail, provided she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to his satisfaction on the following conditions:- (I). that the petitioner shall make herself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;
(ii) . that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any police officer, and
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-5115/2026]
(iii) . that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /95