Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/6092/2026 of KAPIL MEENA S/O HUKAMRAJ Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 21 April 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6092/2026 Kapil Meena S/o Hukamraj, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Ulthi, Thana Sadar Baran, District Baran, Rajasthan. Presently Confined In District Jail Baran. ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6092/2026
Kapil Meena S/o Hukamraj, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Ulthi, Thana Sadar Baran, District Baran, Rajasthan. Presently Confined In District Jail Baran.
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan, through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Prithvi Raj Singh
For Respondent(s)
:
Ms. Aarti Sharma, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
21/04/2026
1. This bail application has been filed by the accused petitioner u/S 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 280/2025 registered at Police Station Sadar Baran, District Baran for offences under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 126(2), 352, 351(2), 189(2) of BNS, 2023.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that after completion of investigation, the Police has submitted charge-sheet in the matter. He also submits that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 31.12.2025 and he is no more required for any kind of interrogation or recovery. He also submits that from the side of complainant one Naveen Panchal has sustained three injuries which are opined to be simple in nature.
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-6092/2026] Counsel further submits that co-accused Ramratan Meena has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 08.04.2026, passed in bail application No. 1869/2026. Therefore, the accused-petitioner may be released on bail.
3. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor submits that the accused-petitioner alongwith other co-accused attacked on Naveen Panchal who sustained injury in the alleged incident.
4. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material made available on record.
5. On perusal of the case diary, it is revealed that in the alleged incident one Naveen Panchal sustained three injuries and all the three injuries have opined to be simple in nature. The accused- petitioner is in custody since 31.12.2025 and after completion of the investigation the Police has already submitted charge-sheet.
6. Taking into consideration overall facts and circumstances of the case so also the fact that the injuries sustained by the injured were opined to be simple in nature and the accused-petitioner is in custody since 31.12.2025 and the co-accused Ramratan has already been enlarged on bail, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits or demerits of the case deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
7. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided that he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-6092/2026] 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only)(each) to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava /48