Rajasthan High Court
CMA/3044/2025 of FARDEEN S/O SAHRUDDIN Vs RASEED KHAN S/O SULEMAN on 20 April 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 3044/2025 Fardeen S/o Sahruddin, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Village Niwali Tehsil Ramgarh District Alwar (Rajasthan) ----Appellant Versus 1. Raseed Khan S/o Suleman, R/o Village Bardod Tehsil Ramgarh District Alwar (Raj.)
[2026:RJ-JP:16679]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 3044/2025
Fardeen S/o Sahruddin, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Village Niwali Tehsil Ramgarh District Alwar (Rajasthan)
----Appellant
Versus
1.
Raseed Khan S/o Suleman, R/o Village Bardod Tehsil Ramgarh District Alwar (Raj.) Driver Vehicle Motorcycle Number Rj 02-Ks 7904
2.
Mehboob Ali S/o Ali Mohammad, R/o Village Dohali Tehsil Ramgarh District Alwar (Raj.) Owner Vehicle Motorcycle Number Rj 02-Ks 7904
3.
Tata Aig General Insurance Company Limited, Peninsula Business Park, Tower A. 15Th Floor GK Marg Lower Parel Mumbai-13 Through Insurer Vehicle Motorcycle Number Rj 02-Ks 7904
----Respondents
For Appellant(s)
:
Mr. Aaditya Mittal for
Mr. Ram Sharan Sharma
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Chanderdeep Singh Jodha
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Judgment
20/04/2026
1. This appeal has been filed under section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 by the appellant-claimant (for short ‘claimant’) against the judgment and award dated 20.03.2025 passed by Motor Accident Claim Tribunal, Alwar (Raj.) in Claim Petition No.24/2018, CIS No.24/2018, whereby claim petition filed by the claimant was partly allowed.
2. At the outset, learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that during the pendency of this appeal, the parties have resolved their dispute amicably by way of a compromise and pray that the present appeal be disposed of in light of the said compromise.
[2026:RJ-JP:16679] (2 of 2) [CMA-3044/2025]
3. A copy of memo of compromise duly signed by learned counsel for the claimant and the Insurance Company, has been placed on record on 18.03.2026. On a specific query by this Court, learned counsel for the parties submit that they are duly authorized by their respective parties to execute the memo of compromise, which reads as under:- "The parties to this litigation i.e. Appellant- Claimants and Respondent-No.3, TATA AIG General Insurance Company have entered into compromise on the following terms:-
1. An additional lump-sum amount of Rs.4,00,000/- (Four Lakh only) (including interest) shall be paid to the claimant by insurance company by depositing the same before tribunal concerns within 2 months from today i.e. from date of compromise order in full and final settlement of appeal with claimants. The said enhancement amount shall be disbursed to the claimants through saving bank account.
2. In case, the insurance company fails to deposit the said amount within 2 months from today ie. from the date of compromise order, claimants shall be entitled for interest @ 6% PA from date of compromise order, till payment is made.
3. That appeal is agreed to be disposed of in terms of this compromise.”
4. In view of the above, the present appeal is disposed of in terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties.
5. All pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J TN/118