Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/3872/2026 of ROHIT KUMAR S/O RAMJILAL Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 18 April 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3872/2026 Rohit Kumar S/o Ramjilal, R/o Magazine Colony, Todra, Phalodi (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Sawai Madhopur). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3872/2026
Rohit Kumar S/o Ramjilal, R/o Magazine Colony, Todra, Phalodi (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Sawai Madhopur).
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan, through PP
----Respondent
Connected With
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5191/2026
Rishikesh S/o Ramprasad, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Gothda, Police Station Mantown, Haal Resident Of Hajjamkhedi, Police Station Rawanjna Dungar District Sawai Madhopur. (At Present Confined In District Jail Sawai Madhopur).
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan, through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Ms. Swati Sharma in CRLMB
No.3872/2026
Mr. Tarun Jain in CRLMB
No.5191/2026
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Shree Ram Dhakad, Public
Prosecutor
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
18/04/2026
1. These bail applications have been filed by the petitioners under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with FIR No.39/2026 registered at Police Station Rawanjana Dungar, District Sawai Madhopur for offences
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-3872/2026] under Sections 319(2), 318(4) & 61(2)(a) of BNS, 2023 and Section 66D of Information Technology (Amended) Act, 2008.
2. Learned counsels for the accused-petitioners submit that the accused-petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and they are in custody since long. Learned counsels further submit that the Police after completion of investigation has already submitted charge-sheet in the matter and the accused-petitioners are no more required for any kind of interrogation or recovery. Learned counsels further submit that no other criminal case of similar nature is there to the discredit of the accused-petitioners. Therefore, accused-petitioners may be released on bail.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail applications.
4. Considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material available on record.
5. Having regard the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners so also the fact that the Police after completion of investigation has already submitted charge-sheet in the matter and the accused-petitioners are in custody since long, this Court without expressing any opinion on merits or demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail.
6. Accordingly, these bail applications are allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners named above shall be released on bail provided, each of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only)
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-3872/2026] each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
7. In case the accused-petitioners are found to be involved in any other criminal case of similar nature in future, the prosecution may move application for cancellation of their bail. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ashish Kumar /24-25