Rajasthan High Court
CMA/208/2003 of RAM SWAROP AND ORS Vs MAN SINGH AND ORS on 18 April 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 208/2003 1. Ram Swaroop S/o Kalyan Sahay, R/o Rampura Tehsil Baswa, Distt. Dausa 2. Babu Lal S/o Sh. Kalyan Sahay, R/o Rampura Tehsil Baswa, District Dausa ----Appellants Versus 1. Shri Man Singh S/o Sh. Ram Sahay, R/o
[2026:RJ-JP:16390]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 208/2003
1.
Ram Swaroop S/o Kalyan Sahay, R/o Rampura Tehsil Baswa, Distt. Dausa
2.
Babu Lal S/o Sh. Kalyan Sahay, R/o Rampura Tehsil Baswa, District Dausa
----Appellants
Versus
1.
Shri Man Singh S/o Sh. Ram Sahay, R/o Om Nagar Nangala Radd Mauja Nau Gaon, Tehsil Sarabad, District Agra U.P.
2.
Shri Vijay Singh S/o Shri Chironji, R/o G.T. Road Near Jiroli Fatak, Dholpur Raj.
3.
Anil Kumar Parmar S/o Shri Purushottam Dev Rajput, R/o 123, Avtar Singh Marg, Agra, Distt. Agra U.p.
4.
The United India Insurance Company Ltd. Through its Regional Manager, Regional Office, Sahara Chamber, Tonk Road, Jaipur
5.
Chatar Singh S/o Sh. Bhanwar Singh, R/o Kolwa, Tehsil Baswa, District Dausa Raj.
6.
The National Insurance Company Limited Through its Regional Manager, Regional Office 10, Narain Singh Circle Jaipur
----Respondents
For Appellant(s)
:
Mr. Aditya Sharma, for
Mr. Jai Prakash Gupta
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Praveen Kumar Jain
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
18/04/2026
1. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that in spite of best efforts, he is not getting any instructions from the appellants to enable him to pursue the appeal.
[2026:RJ-JP:16390] (2 of 2) [CMA-208/2003]
2. Accordingly, the present civil miscellaneous appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
3. The appellants shall be at liberty to move an application for revival of the appeal, in case cause of action still survives. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J 1 - RAVI KHANDELWAL