Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/4669/2026 of MUSTAFA S/O HARUN Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 18 April 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4669/2026 Mustafa S/o Harun, R/o Amlaki Bhiwadi, Police Station Bhiwadi, District Khairthal-Tijara (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Kishangarh Bas) ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through
[2026:RJ-JP:16421]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4669/2026
Mustafa S/o Harun, R/o Amlaki Bhiwadi, Police Station Bhiwadi, District Khairthal-Tijara (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Kishangarh Bas)
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan, through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Sanjay Khan
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Shree Ram Dhakad, Public
Prosecutor
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
18/04/2026
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioner in connection with FIR No.58/2026 registered at Police Station Bhiwadi, District Bhiwadi for the offences under Section 109(1) of BNS, 2023 and Section 5/27 Arms Act.
2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been implicated in this case based on false and fabricated case. He further submits that the present FIR has been lodged by the complainant because of some previous enmity. He further submits that in the alleged incident, no injury has been sustained by the complainant party and the accused-petitioner is in custody since 31.01.2026.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application.
[2026:RJ-JP:16421] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4669/2026]
4. Having regard to the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner and more particularly the fact that the complainant party has not sustained any injury, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits or demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner named above shall be enlarged on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- together with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ashish Kumar /27