Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/5947/2026 of RAMPAL S/O RAMKISHORE Vs THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 18 April 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5947/2026 Rampal S/o Ramkishore, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Tangla, Police Station Rol, Haal Bajrang Colony, Nagour, District Jhalawar. (At Present Confined In District Jail Jhalawar). ----Petitioner Versus
[2026:RJ-JP:16451]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.
5947/2026
Rampal S/o Ramkishore, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Tangla, Police Station Rol, Haal Bajrang Colony, Nagour, District Jhalawar. (At Present Confined In District Jail Jhalawar).
----Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Tarun Jain,
Mr. D.K. Jangid
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
18/04/2026
1. This bail application has been filed by the accused-peti- tioner under Section 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 115/2024 registered at Police Station Kotwali Jhalawar, District Jhalawar for offences under Sections 8, 21, 29 of the NDPS Act.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case merely on the basis of the statements of the co-accused namely; Karan and Sunil. He further submits that alleged contraband i.e. smack weighing 160 gram from Karan and 100 gram from co-accused Sunil. They in their statements said that they were going to supply this smack to the petitioner. Counsel further submits that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 03.03.2026 and trial of the case is likely to take considerable time to conclude, therefore, the accused-petitioner may be released on bail.
[2026:RJ-JP:16451] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5947/2026]
3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application.
4. Having regard to the submission made by the counsel for the petitioner and so also the fact that nothing is said to have been recovered from the possession of the accused-petitioner and has been implicated in this case merely on the basis of the statements of co-accused, this Court without expressing any opinion on merits or demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
5. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided that he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) (each) to the satisfac- tion of the Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear be- fore that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
6. However, it is made clear that in case the accused- petitioner is found to be involved in any other criminal case of similar nature in future, the prosecution would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of this bail order.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J SHRUTI SHARMA /42