Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/5275/2026 of JAIPAL S/O DHANPAT SINGH Vs THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 18 April 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5275/2026 1. Jaipal S/o Dhanpat Singh, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Patuheda, Police Station Kasaula, District Rewari, Haryana. (At Present Accused Petitioner Is Confined In Sub Jail Kishangarhbas, Alwar). 2.
[2026:RJ-JP:16428]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5275/2026
1.
Jaipal S/o Dhanpat Singh, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Patuheda, Police Station Kasaula, District Rewari, Haryana. (At Present Accused Petitioner Is Confined In Sub Jail Kishangarhbas, Alwar).
2.
Komal S/o Mahaveer, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Mangleshwar, Police Station Bawal, District Rewari, Haryana. (At Present Accused Petitioner Is Confined In Sub Jail Kishangarhbas, Alwar).
----Petitioners
Versus
The State of Rajasthan, through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Ms. Seema Shekhar
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Shree Ram Dhakad, Public
Prosecutor
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
18/04/2026
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioners in connection with FIR No.62/2026 registered at Police Station Shekhpur Ahir, District Bhiwadi for the offences under Sections 338, 336(3), 178, 180 and 61(2) of BNS, 2023.
2. Heard.
3. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material made available on record.
[2026:RJ-JP:16428] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5275/2026]
4. As per facts on record, the allegations against the accused- petitioners is that during search one counterfeit note of Rs.500/- is said to have been recovered from possession of each of the accused-petitioners and they are in custody since 12.03.2026.
5. Taking into consideration overall facts and circumstances of the case and more particularly the fact that only one counterfeit note has been recovered from possession of each of the accused- petitioners, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits or demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners named above shall be enlarged on bail provided, each of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- together with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ashish Kumar /31