Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/5819/2026 of HANSRAJ @ FOUJI @ KALU S/O SHRI NEMICHAND Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 17 April 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5819/2026 Hansraj @ Fouji @ Kalu S/o Shri Nemichand, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Ward No. 1, Gonera, Police Thana Paniyala, District Kotputli-Behror. (Raj.) (Petitioner Confined In District Jail Kotputli).
[2026:RJ-JP:16264]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5819/2026
Hansraj @ Fouji @ Kalu S/o Shri Nemichand, Aged About 20
Years, R/o Ward No. 1, Gonera, Police Thana Paniyala, District Kotputli-Behror. (Raj.) (Petitioner Confined In District Jail Kotputli).
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan, through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Neeraj Sharma
For Respondent(s)
:
Ms. Aarti Sharma, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
17/04/2026
1. This bail application has been filed by the accused petitioner u/S 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 52/2026 registered at Police Station Paniyala, District Kotputli-Behror for offence u/S 331(3) & 305(a) of the BNS.
2. Heard and considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor.
3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the accused petitioner that the accused petitioner has been implicated in a case based on false and fabricated facts. The accused petitioner is said to be in custody since 16.03.2026 and after completion of investigation, the police has submitted charge-sheet in the matter
[2026:RJ-JP:16264] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5819/2026] and the offences alleged against the accused petitioner are triable by Magistrate.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. Having regard to the submissions made at bar and the fact that the accused petitioner is in custody since 16.03.2026 and the offences alleged against him are triable by Magistrate, this Court, without expressing any opinion on merits or demerits of this case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
6. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided that he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only)(each) to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava /54