Rajasthan High Court

CRLMB/5069/2026 of YOGENDRA @ GHODA S/O RAMSINGH Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 17 April 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5069/2026 Yogendra @ Ghoda S/o Ramsingh, R/o Chiruni, Tehsil And Police Station Mundawar, District Khairthal-Tijara. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) :

[2026:RJ-JP:16306]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

5069/2026

Yogendra @ Ghoda S/o Ramsingh, R/o Chiruni, Tehsil And Police Station Mundawar, District Khairthal-Tijara.

----Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Rohan Singh

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Shree Ram Dhakad, P.P.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

17/04/2026

1. The petitioner has filed this anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of B.N.S.S. arising out of F.I.R. No.470/2025 registered with the Police Station, Mundawar, District Khairthal- Tijara, for offence under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 110, 324(2), 303(2) and 189(2) of B.N.S., 2023.

2. Heard.

3. Considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the case diary.

4. As per the facts on record, the accused-petitioner, along with other persons, came driving a car and hit the scooter of the complainant, due to which the complainant fell down and sustained injuries.

[2026:RJ-JP:16306] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5069/2026]

5. The allegations against the petitioner are substantiated by the injury report and the photographs of the scooter available in the case diary. As per the rejection order passed by the Court Below, the petitioner is facing as many as eleven (11) other criminal cases.

6. Taking into consideration the allegations levelled against the present petitioner and so also the fact that he is facing other eleven criminal cases, this Court is not inclined to entertain the present anticipatory bail application.

7. The present anticipatory bail application is accordingly dismissed. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /81

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead