Rajasthan High Court

CRLMB/5645/2026 of RAJESH KUMAR S/O PRITHVIRAJ Vs THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 17 April 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5645/2026 Rajesh Kumar S/o Prithviraj, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Mandalgaon, Police Station Batoda, District Sawaimadhopur, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Kotputli). ----Petitioner Versus The

[2026:RJ-JP:16203]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

5645/2026

Rajesh Kumar S/o Prithviraj, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Mandalgaon, Police Station Batoda, District Sawaimadhopur, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Kotputli).

----Petitioner

Versus

The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Asgar Khan,

Mr. Junaid Khan

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, P.P.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

17/04/2026

1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioner in connection with FIR No. 148/2025 registered at Police Station Paniyala, District Kotputli-Behror for offence under Sections 305(b) of BNS 2023.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner is a supervisor of contractor Bhupendra. He further submits that the petitioner has no connection with renewal of the material. Counsel also submits that accused-petitioner is in custody since 25.03.2026 and there is no other criminal case is registered against him, therefore, he may be released on bail.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application.

4. Taking into consideration the overall facts and

[2026:RJ-JP:16203] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5645/2026] circumstances of the case and so also the fact that he is in custody since 25.03.2026 and offence is being triable my Magistrate, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.

5. Accordingly, the present bail application is allowed and it is directed that the accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided that he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lax Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/-(Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J SHRUTI SHARMA /47

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead