Rajasthan High Court

CRLMB/5834/2026 of TEJU ALIAS TEJKARAN S/O BANE SINGH Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 17 April 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5834/2026 Teju Alias Tejkaran S/o Bane Singh, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Dabla Chatri, Police Station Badod, District Agar Malwa (M.p.) (Presently Confined In Sub District Jail At Bhawani Mandi).

[2026:RJ-JP:16265]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5834/2026

Teju Alias Tejkaran S/o Bane Singh, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Dabla Chatri, Police Station Badod, District Agar Malwa (M.p.)

(Presently Confined In Sub District Jail At Bhawani Mandi).

----Petitioner

Versus

State of Rajasthan, through PP

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Rajveer Singh Jhala

For Respondent(s)

:

Ms. Aarti Sharma, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

17/04/2026

1. This bail application has been filed by the accused petitioner u/S 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 24/2026 registered at Police Station Dug, District Jhalawar for offence u/S 8, 20 & 29 of the NDPS Act.

2. Heard.

3. Considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor.

4. As per the prosecution, the allegation is that 1.120 Kg. of illegal drug ganja was said to have been recovered from the possession of the co-accused Govindnath who is said to have brought the said drug from the present petitioner. The petitioner has been arrayed as an accused with the aid of Section 8/29 of N.D.P.S. Act and is in custody since 30.03.2026. The police after

[2026:RJ-JP:16265] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5834/2026] completion of investigation, has submitted charge-sheet in the matter.

5. In criminal jurisprudence, the statement of an accused solely cannot be made the basis for conviction of other accused persons.

6. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and more particularly the fact that the allegation against the present petitioner is of providing the alleged contraband to the person from whose possession it was recovered, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.

7. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided that he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

8. In case the accused-petitioner is found to be involved in any other criminal case of similar nature in future, the prosecution may move application for cancellation of his bail. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava /56

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead