Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/5264/2026 of RAHUL KUMAR S/O JAGDISH KUMAR Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 17 April 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5264/2026 Rahul Kumar S/o Jagdish Kumar, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Dolatpura Police Station Ghar, District Tonk (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For
[2026:RJ-JP:16560]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5264/2026
Rahul Kumar S/o Jagdish Kumar, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Dolatpura Police Station Ghar, District Tonk (Rajasthan).
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan, through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Anmol Dhakar
For Respondent(s)
:
Ms. Arti Sharma, Public Prosecutor
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
17/04/2026
1. This anticipatory bail application has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioner in connection with FIR No.72/2025 registered at Police Station Ghar, District Tonk for the offences under Section 8/20 of the NDPS Act and Section 19/54 of the Rajasthan Excise Act, 1950.
2. Heard.
3. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material made available on record.
4. The alleged contraband Ganja weighing about 74.580 Kg and Bhang weighing about 107 Kg are said to have been recovered from the house which is in the useful possession of the accused- petitioner and the co-accused.
[2026:RJ-JP:16560] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5264/2026]
5. In view of the fact of recovery of the alleged contraband from the premises of the accused-petitioner, this Court is not inclined to extend the benefit of anticipatory bail to the accused- petitioner.
6. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ashish Kumar /85