Rajasthan High Court
CMAP/19/2026 of DR VRINDAVAN LAL SHARMA S/O M L SHARMA Vs DR. MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA S/O S N SHARMA on 17 April 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 19/2026 Dr Vrindavan Lal Sharma S/o M L Sharma, Aged About 63 Years, R/o Plot No. 163, Surya Nagar, Gopalpura Bypass Jaipur ----Petitioner Versus 1. Dr. Mahesh Chandra Sharma S/o S N Sharma, Aged About 63 Years,
[2026:RJ-JP:16292-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 19/2026
Dr Vrindavan Lal Sharma S/o M L Sharma, Aged About 63 Years, R/o Plot No. 163, Surya Nagar, Gopalpura Bypass Jaipur
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
Dr. Mahesh Chandra Sharma S/o S N Sharma, Aged About 63 Years, R/o Plot No. 21 Shahpura Bagh Amer Road Jaipur
2.
Dr. Matadeen Sharma S/o M L Sharma, Aged About 63
Years, R/o B-2 Sen Colony Powerhouse Road Near Railway Station Jaipur
3.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Ayurveda (Ayush) Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
4.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Ayurveda And Bhartiya Chikitsa (Ayush), Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
5.
Dy. Secretary, Department Of Ayurveda And Bhartiya Chikitsa (Ayush), Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
6.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
7.
Director Ayurveda, Directorate Of Ayurveda, Ajmer.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Anurag Sharma (through VC)
For Respondent(s)
:
--
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
17/04/2026
1. Defects pointed out by the Registry are waived.
[2026:RJ-JP:16292-DB] (2 of 2) [CMAP-19/2026]
2. An application has been moved by the petitioner stating that in the order passed by the Court dated 23.09.2025, the cause title of D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 919/2025 has been wrongly typed, mentioning name of father of Dr. Vrindavan Lal Sharma as M.L. Sharma, whereas the name of father of Dr. Vrindavan Lal Sharma should be B.K Sharma. The application is supported by an affidavit.
3. We, therefore, allow the application and direct that, in the cause title of our order passed in D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 919/2025, the name of petitioner No.2 therein, shall be read as “Dr. Vrindavan Lal Sharma, son of B.K. Sharma” instead of “Dr. Vrindavan Lal Sharma, son of M.L. Sharma.”
4. The order shall be treated as part and parcel of the order passed in D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 919/2025 dated 23.09.2025.
(SANJEET PUROHIT),J (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),ACTING CJ Divya Tak-6