Rajasthan High Court

CRLMB/5186/2026 of VIRENDRA S/O SHRI DHARAMPAL Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 17 April 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5186/2026 Virendra S/o Shri Dharampal, R/o Alwar Road, Near N H 08 Behror, Tehsil Behror, District Presently Kotputali-Behror (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For

[2026:RJ-JP:16569]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5186/2026

Virendra S/o Shri Dharampal, R/o Alwar Road, Near N H 08

Behror, Tehsil Behror, District Presently Kotputali-Behror (Raj.).

----Petitioner

Versus

State of Rajasthan, through PP

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Gopal Gupta

For Respondent(s)

:

Ms. Arti Sharma, Public Prosecutor

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

17/04/2026

1. This anticipatory bail application has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioner in connection with FIR No.10/2026 registered at Police Station Bahror, District Kotputli-Behror for the offence under Section 8/20 of the N.D.P.S. Act.

2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the accused-petitioner has been made an accused showing him to be a tenant of a room from where the alleged contraband i.e. Ganja weighing about 37.912 Kg is said to have been recovered.

3. Learned counsel further submits that the accused-petitioner has never visited to this place and has never taken the alleged premises on rent. He also submits that the accused-petitioner is ready to cooperate with the investigation.

[2026:RJ-JP:16569] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5186/2026]

4. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application and submits that the statements of the owner of the premises has been recorded who in his statement had deposed that the room from where the alleged contraband has been recovered was given on rent to the present accused-petitioner for an amount of Rs.2700/- per month.

5. Taking into consideration the fact that there is recovery of Ganja weighing about 37.912 Kg from a room which is said to be given on rent to the accused-petitioner, this Court prima-facie finds that the accused-petitioner is connected with the alleged contraband recovered. Hence, the Court is not inclined to extent the benefit of anticipatory bail to the present accused-petitioner.

6. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ashish Kumar /84

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead