Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/2080/2026 of PINTU KUMAR TANWAR S/O PANCHULAL Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 17 April 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2080/2026 Pintu Kumar Tanwar S/o Panchulal, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Durjanpura Police Station Ghatoli District Jhalawar (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Sub District Jail, Aklera District Jhalawar (Raj.)
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.
2080/2026
Pintu Kumar Tanwar S/o Panchulal, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Durjanpura Police Station Ghatoli District Jhalawar (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Sub District Jail, Aklera District Jhalawar (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Rohit Khandelwal
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
17/04/2026
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioner in connection with FIR No. 102/2025 registered at Police Station Aklera, District Jhalawar for offence under Sections 8, 21, 29 of the N.D.P.S. Act 1985.
2. Heard.
3. Considered the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the challan papers.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been arrayed as an accused on the basis of the statement of the co-accused namely; Ramesh Chand from
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-2080/2026] whose possession the alleged contraband i.e. 118.9 gram smack is said to have been recovered.
5. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner further submits that the allegations against the accused-petitioner is of providing the alleged contraband to the co-accused Ramesh Chand. He also submits that other co-accused namely; Ghanshyam and Vivek @ Nandu Tada who has also been arrayed as an accused with the aid of Section 8/29 have already been enlarged on bail and the case of the present accused-petitioner is in no manner distinguishable from the case of the co-accused who have been enlarged on bail. Counsel also submits that accused- petitioner is in custody since 04.01.2026 and police after completion of the investigation has already submitted charge- sheet in the matter.
6. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application and submits that four other criminal cases are pending against the accused-petitioner, out of which, two cases are of similar nature.
7. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the FIR No. 39/2025 registered at Police Station Kotwali, District Nagaur is also shown to be against the accused-petitioner, however, till date he has not been arrested, even though he has made an application before the concerned Magistrate to ascertain as to whether he is accused or not in that FIR and there is no disposal order on that application.
8. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and so also the allegation against the accused-petitioner and more particularly the fact that two other
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-2080/2026] co-accused persons have already been enlarged on bail and police after completion of investigation has already submitted charge- sheet in the matter, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits or demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
9. Accordingly, the present bail application is allowed and it is directed that the accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided that he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lax Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/-(Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
10. However, it is made clear that in case the accused- petitioner is found to be involved in any other criminal case of similar nature in future, the prosecution would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of this bail order. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J SHRUTI SHARMA /27