Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/5750/2026 of BAJRANG SINGH S/O BHANWARSINGH Vs THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 17 April 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5750/2026 Bajrang Singh S/o Bhanwarsingh, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Karanga Bada Tehsil Fatehpur, Dist. Sikar Rajasthan (Raj.) (Petitioner Is In Dist. Jail Siker). ----Accused/Petitioner Versus The State Of
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.
5750/2026
Bajrang Singh S/o Bhanwarsingh, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Karanga Bada Tehsil Fatehpur, Dist. Sikar Rajasthan (Raj.)
(Petitioner Is In Dist. Jail Siker).
----Accused/Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Ali Mohammed Khan
Ms. Drishti Mishra and
Mr. Lakshay Kumar Sharma
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Shree Ram Dhakad, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
17/04/2026
1. The petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S., arising out of F.I.R. No.64/2025 registered with the Police Station Fatehpur Sadar, District Sikar, for offence under Sections 8 and 20 of the NDPS Act.
2. Heard.
3. Considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the case diary.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been implicated in this case being the registered owner of the vehicle- Fortuner Car bearing No.RJ-23 UB 7821 alleged to have been used for transportation of the contraband. He
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-5750/2026] also submits that the alleged incident is of 13.04.2025, whereas prior to this on 08.01.2025, the petitioner has transferred the aforesaid vehicle to one Shankar Singh Shekhawat by an agreement and since thereafter, Shankar Singh Shekhawat was using the said vehicle. He also submits that there is variation in the information of co-accused, Virendra Singh, given under Section 23 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023. He also submits that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 02.10.2025; the police after completion of investigation, has submitted charge-sheet in the matter and trial of the case is likely to take considerable time to conclude, therefore, he may be enlarged on bail.
5. The learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application and submits that the quantity of contraband, involved in the present criminal case, is above the commercial quantity and, therefore, in view of the provisions of Section 37 of the NDPS Act, the petitioner does not deserve any indulgence of bail.
6. The petitioner has been arrayed as an accused in view of the fact that the alleged vehicle- Fortuner Car bearing No.RJ-23 UB 7821, being used for transportation of the alleged contraband, is registered in the name of the present petitioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner has placed before this Court the certified copy of the agreement of transfer of the said vehicle in the name of Shanker Singh Shekhawat w.e.f. 08.01.2025. There is some variation in the information given by co-accused, Virendra Singh, regarding who brought the alleged contraband.
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-5750/2026]
7. Taking into consideration the allegations against the present petitioner and other material facts, as discussed above and the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 02.10.2025, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
8. This bail application is, accordingly, allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter be transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /69