Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/5784/2026 of SANDEEP S/O KRISHAN SINGH Vs THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 17 April 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5784/2026 Sandeep S/o Krishan Singh, R/o Dilawarpur, Police Station Vijay Mandir, District Alwar, Raj. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Kishangarhbas) ----Petitioner Versus The State of Rajasthan, through
[2026:RJ-JP:16354]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5784/2026
Sandeep S/o Krishan Singh, R/o Dilawarpur, Police Station Vijay Mandir, District Alwar, Raj. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Kishangarhbas)
----Petitioner
Versus
The State of Rajasthan, through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Manjeet Kumar
For Respondent(s)
:
Ms. Arti Sharma, Public Prosecutor
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
17/04/2026
1. This bail application has been filed by the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with FIR No.315/2025 registered at Police Station Khairthal, District Khairthal-Tijara for offences under Sections 318(2), 318(4), 61(2) & 112(2) of BNS, 2023 and Section 66D of Information Technology Act.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he is in custody since 30.09.2025. Learned counsel further submits that the Police after completion of investigation has submitted charge-sheet in the matter and the petitioner is no more required for any kind of interrogation or recovery. Learned counsel further submit that there is no other criminal case to the discredit of the accused- petitioner. Therefore, the accused-petitioner may be released on bail.
[2026:RJ-JP:16354] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5784/2026]
3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application.
4. Considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material available on record.
5. Having regard the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner so also the fact that the Police after completion of investigation has submitted charge-sheet in the matter and the accused-petitioner is in custody since 30.09.2025, this Court without expressing any opinion on merits or demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
6. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner named above shall be released on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
7. In case the accused-petitioner is found to be involved in any other criminal case of similar nature in future, the prosecution may move application for cancellation of his bail. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ashish Kumar /50