Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/3524/2026 of VISHAL @ DHANRAJ S/O RAJMAL MEENA Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 17 April 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3524/2026 Vishal @ Dhanraj S/o Rajmal Meena, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Kotdi Tulsa, Police Station Sadar Baran, District Baran (Raj.). ----Accused/Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
[2026:RJ-JP:16297]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.
3524/2026
Vishal @ Dhanraj S/o Rajmal Meena, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Kotdi Tulsa, Police Station Sadar Baran, District Baran (Raj.).
----Accused/Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Anshul Sharma
Mr. Rohan Jain
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Shree Ram Dhakad, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
17/04/2026
1. The petitioner has filed this anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of B.N.S.S. arising out of F.I.R. No.272/2025 registered with the Police Station, Baran Sadar, District Baran for offence under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 110, 189(2) and 352 of B.N.S., 2023.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case merely because he is a government servant. He further submits that the petitioner is ready to cooperate with the investigation, therefore, he may be given the benefit of anticipatory bail.
3. The learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the anticipatory bail application and submits that there is specific allegation against the present petitioner of inflicting injuries on the vital part of body of the injured by a sharp edged weapon. He also
[2026:RJ-JP:16297] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3524/2026] submits that the injured person has sustained as many as seven injuries, out of which two injuries have been opined to be grievous in nature.
4. Heard.
5. Considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material made available on record.
6. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and more particularly the fact that there is specific allegation against the petitioner of inflicting injuries on the vital part of body, i.e., head of the injured by a sharp edged weapon and the injured has also sustained two grievous injuries, this Court is not inclined to entertain the present anticipatory bail application.
7. Accordingly, the present anticipatory bail application is dismissed. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /78