Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/3898/2026 of SACHIN @ SHERA S/O SHRI RAJESH Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 16 April 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3898/2026 Sachin @ Shera S/o Shri Rajesh, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Milakpur, Tehsil Behror, District Kotputli-Behror. (Presently Confined At Sub Jail Behror). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan,
[2026:RJ-JP:16053]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3898/2026
Sachin @ Shera S/o Shri Rajesh, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Milakpur, Tehsil Behror, District Kotputli-Behror. (Presently Confined At Sub Jail Behror).
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan, through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Ms. Reena Yadav
For Respondent(s)
:
Ms. Aarti Sharma, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
16/04/2026
1. This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 318/2025 registered at Police Station Behror Sadar, District Kotputli-Behror for offences punishable u/S 326(g) of BNS.
2. Heard and considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor.
3. The allegation against the accused petitioner is that he led fire to the shop of the complainant and as a result, the complainant sustained huge damage of about Rs.50,000/-. The accused petitioner is said to have been in custody since 20.02.2026 and there is no independent witness of the alleged incident.
[2026:RJ-JP:16053] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3898/2026]
4. Looking to the facts of this case, possibility of false implication cannot be ruled out. Hence, this Court, taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and allegation against the accused petitioner, who is in custody since 20.02.2026, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail.
5. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided that he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava /65