Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/5714/2026 of PRADEEP S/O JAGDISH Vs THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 16 April 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 5714/2026 Pradeep S/o Jagdish, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Jaini, Police Sta- tion Manpur, District Sheopur (Madhyapradesh). (At Present Con- fined In District Jail Sawai Madhopur). ----Petitioner Versus
[2026:RJ-JP:15778]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No.
5714/2026
Pradeep S/o Jagdish, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Jaini, Police Sta- tion Manpur, District Sheopur (Madhyapradesh). (At Present Con- fined In District Jail Sawai Madhopur).
----Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Tarun Jain
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
16/04/2026
1. This second bail application has been filed by the accused-petitioner under Section 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 0006/2026 registered at Police Station Khandar, District Sawai Madhopur for offences under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 336(3), 338, 112(2) of B.N.S. 2023 and under Section 13 of the RPGO and under Section 66C, 66D of the IT Act, 2008.
2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in the case and he is in custody since 07.01.2026. Counsel further submits that Police after completion of investigation, has submitted charge- sheet in the matter and there is no other criminal case is pending against the accused-petitioner. Counsel also submits that trial of the case is likely to take considerable time to conclude, therefore, the accused-petitioner may be enlarged on bail.
[2026:RJ-JP:15778] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5714/2026]
3. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State opposed the bail application.
4. Considered the submissions made by the counsel for the accused-petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor.
5. Having regard to the submissions made on behalf of the accused-petitioner so also the fact that Police after completion of investigation has submitted charge-sheet in the matter and he is in custody since 07.01.2026, this Court without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
6. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided that he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) (each) to the satisfac- tion of the Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear be- fore that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
7. However, it is made clear that in case the accused- petitioner is found to be involved in any other criminal case of similar nature in future, the prosecution may move an application for cancellation of this bail. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J SHRUTI SHARMA /3