Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals
MAHESH KUMAR SONI vs BANK OF BARODA on 15 July 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur * Item no.14 Case No. MA/1/2020 IN OA/473/2018 MAHESH KUMAR SONI Vs BANK OF BARODA Date: 15.07.2025 Proceedings through hybrid mode Present: Shri Sanjeev Sharma, Counsel for the Applicant Shri R N Vijay, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
In this matter, Counsel for the applicant seeks time for settlement with the bank and ask for an adjournment.
This MA is filed in the year 2020 already almost 4/5 years have passed and there was ample opportunity with him to settle this matter.
Counsel for the Respondent submits that it is an admitted fact in their application that summons was received by them and they have engaged an advocate. He submits those MA applicants was aware of the proceedings and deliberately choose not to appear.
In these circumstances, MA stands disposed of as dismissed, however incase the applicant gives a settlement proposal, and respondents will consider the same as per their policy.
Accordingly, MA stands disposed of, all pending IAs also stands disposed off, if any. File be consigned to record as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur