Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/4202/2026 of JITENDRA YADAV URF JEETU BOHRA S/O JAGMAL YADAV Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 16 April 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4202/2026 Jitendra Yadav Urf Jeetu Bohra S/o Jagmal Yadav, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Kuned, Police Station Pragpura, District Kotputali- Behrod, Rajasthan. (Presently The Accused Is In Judicial Custody In
[2026:RJ-JP:16055]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.
4202/2026
Jitendra Yadav Urf Jeetu Bohra S/o Jagmal Yadav, Aged About 28
Years, R/o Kuned, Police Station Pragpura, District Kotputali- Behrod, Rajasthan. (Presently The Accused Is In Judicial Custody In District Jail Kotputali).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Manish Gupta
For Respondent(s)
:
Ms. Aarti Sharma, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
16/04/2026
1. The petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S., arising out of F.I.R. No.54/2026 registered with the Police Station Sarund, District Kotputali-Behror, for offence under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 352, 351(2), 189(2), 140(3) and 307 of B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 3 and 25 of the Arms Act.
2. Heard.
3. Considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor and so also perused the case diary.
4. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is that he was along with other co-accused while making attack on the
[2026:RJ-JP:16055] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4202/2026] complainant and his colleague. As per the contents of the F.I.R., there is no specific overt act assigned to the present petitioner. The petitioner is said to have been in custody since 04.03.2026.
5. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and more particularly the fact that no specific overt act has been assigned to the petitioner in the F.I.R. and he is in custody since 04.03.2026, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
6. This bail application is, accordingly, allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter be transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /72