Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/3888/2026 of JAGATSINGH S/O PATRAM Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 15 April 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3888/2026 Jagatsingh S/o Patram, R/o Kali Pahadi, Tehsil Neemrana, District Kotputli, Behror, Rajasthan. (Presently Confined In Behror Jail) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
[2026:RJ-JP:15664]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.
3888/2026
Jagatsingh S/o Patram, R/o Kali Pahadi, Tehsil Neemrana, District Kotputli, Behror, Rajasthan. (Presently Confined In Behror Jail)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Deepak Chauhan with
Mr. Vikas Gurjar
For Respondent(s)
For State
:
:
Mr. Narpat Singh Shekhawat for the
injured
Mr. Sudhanshu Rajawat and
Mr. Rishi Raj Singh for
Mr. Rajendra Singh Rajawat for
complainant
Mr. Shreeram Dhakad, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
15/04/2026
1. Petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S., arising out of F.I.R. No.0182/2025 registered with the Police Station Shahajahanpur, District Kotputli-Behror, for offence under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 109(1) and 189(2) B.N.S., 2023.
2. Heard.
3. Considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor, learned counsel for the complainant as well as the learned counsel for the injured.
[2026:RJ-JP:15664] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3888/2026]
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with the motivation of the elders, the parties have settled the dispute and have entered into compromise.
5. The learned counsels appearing for the complainant as well as the injured, also verify the fact of compromise in between the parties.
6. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and more particularly the fact that the parties have entered into compromise and the petitioner is in custody since 15.01.2026, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
7. This bail application is, accordingly, allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter be transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /73