Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/281/2026 of SALIM @ KALA S/O AJIMA Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 15 April 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 281/2026 Salim @ Kala S/o Ajima, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Alapur Police Station Shekpur Ahir District Khairthal-Tijara (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Kishangarhbas). ----Petitioner Versus State Of
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 281/2026
Salim @ Kala S/o Ajima, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Alapur Police Station Shekpur Ahir District Khairthal-Tijara (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Kishangarhbas).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Sumer Singh Ola
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Sriram Dhaka, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
15/04/2026
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioner in connection with FIR No. 324/2024 registered at Police Station Tapukda, District Bhiwadi for offence under Sections 121(1), 132, 109(1) of BNS 2023 and under Sections 5, 8, 9 Rajasthan Bovine Animal (Prohibition of Slaughter And Regulation of Temporary Migration or Export) Act and under Sections 16, 54 of the Rajasthan Excise Act and under Sections 3, 25, 5, 27 of the Arms Act.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case after a lapse of one year. He also submits that the accused-petitioner has been arrayed as an accused solely on the basis of the statements of the co-accused which solely cannot be a ground of conviction of
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-281/2026] the accused-petitioner. He further submits that after the arrest of the petitioner no test identification parade was conducted and he is in custody since 10.12.2025 and police after completion of the investigation has submitted charge-sheet in the matter.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application submits that there are several other criminal cases are pending against the accused-petitioner.
4. Considered the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor.
5. The learned Public Prosecutor is not in a position to controvert the submission made by the learned counsel for the accused-petitioner that the accused-petitioner has been arrayed as an accused solely on the basis of the statements of the co- accused.
6. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and more particularly the fact that accused-petitioner is in custody since 10.12.2025 and Police after completion of the investigation has submitted charge-sheet in the matter and accused-petitioner has been made an accused on the basis of the statement of the co-accused, this Court without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
7. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided that he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only), together with two sureties in the sum of
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-281/2026] Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J SHRUTI SHARMA /27