Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/5560/2026 of KULDEEP @ K.D. S/O GIRDHARI SINGH Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 13 April 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1181/2026 Kailash Saini S/o Sedhuram, R/o Bansur, Tehsil Bansur, District Kotputli-Behror, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1181/2026
Kailash Saini S/o Sedhuram, R/o Bansur, Tehsil Bansur, District Kotputli-Behror, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan, through PP
----Respondent
Connected With
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3885/2026
Aashish Saini S/o Satish Kumar Saini, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Dhani Naya Kuwa, Bansur, Police Station Bansur, Tehsil Bansur, District Kotputli-Behror (Rajasthan).
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan, through PP
----Respondent
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3886/2026
Hitesh Saini S/o Rajendra Kumar, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Dhani Naya Kuwa, Bansur, Police Station Bansur, Tehsil Bansur, District Kotputli-Behror (Rajasthan).
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan, through PP
----Respondent
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5560/2026
Kuldeep @ K.D. S/o Girdhari Singh, R/o Sathalpur, Tehsil Bansur, District Kotputli-Behror, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan, through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Narpat Singh Shekhawat
Mr. Bharat Yadav
For Respondent(s)
:
Ms. Arti Sharma, Public Prosecutor
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
13/04/2026
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-1181/2026]
1. These anticipatory bail applications have been filed under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioners in connection with FIR No.342/2025 registered at Police Station Bansur, District Kotputli-Behror for the offences under Sections 189(2), 126(2), 109(1) and 324(4) of BNS, 2023.
2. Learned counsels appearing for the accused-petitioners submit that this is a case of no injury, wherein through there are allegations against the accused-petitioners of giving beating to the complainant party however, no medical reports are available on record.
3. Learned counsels also submit that one of the co-accused, namely, Sanju @ Sandeep Singh Shekhawat has already been extended the benefit of anticipatory bail.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail applications.
5. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the case diary and more particularly the description as regards CCTV footage of the alleged incident.
6. The description of the CCTV footage clearly speaks about the act and involvement of the accused-petitioners in commission of offence wherein, they have tried to crush the members of the complainant party by overriding Thar Jeep after hitting the motorcycle. The description of the CCTV footage also shows that the accused named KD @ Kuldeep, Sunil and Kailash Saini have also found involved in the alleged incident.
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-1181/2026]
7. Taking into consideration overall facts and circumstances of the case and more particularly the description of the CCTV footage of the alleged incident, wherein the Court finds active involvement of the accused-petitioners in the alleged offence, this Court is not inclined to extend the benefit of anticipatory bail to the accused- petitioners.
8. Accordingly, these anticipatory bail applications are dismissed. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ashish Kumar /39-42