Rajasthan High Court
CMA/4944/2025 of SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. Vs MASTER RAJVEER KATHAT S/O SHRI RAMESH BEING MINOR REPRESENTED THROUGH FATHER SHRI RAMESH on 6 April 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 4944/2025 Shriram General Insurance Company Ltd., E -8, E.P.I.P. Sitapura, Industrial Area, Jaipur. (Insurance Period Date 15-10- 2022 To 14-10-2023). Through Its Constituent Attorney. ----Appellant Versus 1. Master
[2026:RJ-JP:14205]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 4944/2025
Shriram General Insurance Company Ltd., E -8, E.P.I.P.
Sitapura, Industrial Area, Jaipur. (Insurance Period Date 15-10- 2022 To 14-10-2023). Through Its Constituent Attorney.
----Appellant
Versus
1.
Master Rajveer Kathat S/o Shri Ramesh Being Minor Represented through father Shri Ramesh, R/o Idgah Colony, Chorasiyawas Road, Vaishali Nagar, Ajmer.
2.
Himmat Singh S/o Kailash Singh, R/o Vijaynagar Road, Sendariya, Beawar (Driver Tractor No. RJ-36-RA-1511)
3.
Deena S/o Shri Harji, R/o Thal Ka Baadia, Rawla Baadia, Jhank, Masuda, Beawar. (Vehicle Owner Tractor No. RJ- 36-RA-1511)
----Respondents
For Appellant(s)
:
Mr. Chanderdeep Singh Jodha
For Respondent(s)
:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
06/04/2026
1. The present appeal has been filed agianst the judgment and award dated 04.08.2025 passed by Motor Accident Claim Tribunal (Additional District & Sessions Judge No. 3), Beawar, District – Ajmer in Claim Petition No. 296/2023 titled as Master Rajveer Kathat Vs. Himmat Singh & Ors. whereby the claim petition filed by respondent No. 1 has been partly allowed and a compensation of Rs. 20,000/- was awarded in favour of claimant-respondent No. 1 Master Rajveer Kathat.
[2026:RJ-JP:14205] (2 of 2) [CMA-4944/2025]
2. Section 173 (2) of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 provides that no appeal shall lie against any award of a Claim Tribunal, if the amount in dispute in the appeal, is less than rupees one lakh.
3. In view of the said provision, the present appeal, which has been filed against the impugned award whereby the compensation of Rs. 20,000/- has been awarded, being not maintainable, is dismissed.
4. It is made clear that this order shall not affect other appeal(s), if any, filed by the appellant against the aforesaid impugned judgment and award.
5. All pending applications, if any, shall also stand dismissed.
(SANDEEP TANEJA),J SKS/90