Rajasthan High Court
CCP/60/2026 of SUNDER LAL SON OF SHRI LAXMI NARAYAN Vs JYOTSANA KHEDA, on 28 March 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 60/2026 1. Sunder Lal Son Of Shri Laxmi Narayan, Resident Of Village Ghasipura, Panchayat Kanwat, Tehsil Khandela, District Sikar. 2. Babulal Meena Son Of Mangu Ram, Resident Of Kanwat, Tehsil Khandela, District Sikar. 3.
[2026:RJ-JP:13079-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 60/2026
1.
Sunder Lal Son Of Shri Laxmi Narayan, Resident Of Village Ghasipura, Panchayat Kanwat, Tehsil Khandela, District Sikar.
2.
Babulal Meena Son Of Mangu Ram, Resident Of Kanwat, Tehsil Khandela, District Sikar.
3.
Ram Narayan Saini Son Of Ghadsi Ram, Aged About 60
Years, Resident Of Village Ghasipura, Panchayat Kanwat, Tehsil Khandela, District Sikar.
4.
Phool Chand Son Of Shri Ram Narayan, Resident Of Kachiyagarh Railway Phatak, Shiv Colony, Prithivpura Road, Tehsil Srimadhopur, District Sikar, Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
1.
Jyotsana Kheda, Sub Divisional Officer, Khandela, District Sikar.
2.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Nirmal Kumar Goyal
For Respondent(s)
:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
28/03/2026 Four petitioners jointly filed this contempt petition alleging disobedience of the final order dated 23.04.2019 passed in D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14955/2017. Admittedly, D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No.33/2021 filed by the original writ petitioner for disobedience of the final order dated 23.04.2019 has been disposed of vide order dated 20.07.2023
[2026:RJ-JP:13079-DB] (2 of 2) [CCP-60/2026] and a liberty was given to her for revival of the contempt petition in case her grievance survives. Petitioners, without having any locus and without abiding with the previous order dated 20.07.2023 passed in D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No.33/2021, have preferred this fresh contempt petition, which is sheer misuse of process of law. Counsel for the petitioners, after arguing the contempt petition seeks permission to withdraw the same in order to avail the appropriate remedy for removal of encroachment, if exists, in accordance with law. In view of the above, instant contempt petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Notice(s) of contempt, if any, stands discharged. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J (SUDESH BANSAL),J TANISHA /7