Rajasthan High Court
CRES/994/2024 of ALWAR SAHAKARI BHOOMI VIKAS BANK Vs BADRI PRASAD (DECEASED) S/O SUWALAL, on 19 March 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 994/2024 in S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.1170/2020 Alwar Sahakari Bhoomi Vikas Bank, Branch Rajgarh, Alwar ----Applicant-Appellant Versus 1. Badri Prasad (Deceased) S/o Suwalal, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Raini, Tehsil
[2026:RJ-JP:11847]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 994/2024
in
S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.1170/2020
Alwar Sahakari Bhoomi Vikas Bank, Branch Rajgarh, Alwar
----Applicant-Appellant
Versus
1.
Badri Prasad (Deceased) S/o Suwalal, Aged About 42
Years, R/o Raini, Tehsil Rajgarh District Alwar.
1A. Mu. Gulab Beba Badri Prasad, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Village Raini, Tehsil Rajgarh District Alwar.
1B. Ramsingh S/o Badri Prasad, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village Raini, Tehsil Rajgarh District Alwar.
1C. Vishram S/o Badri Prasad, Aged About 14 Years, R/o Village Raini, Tehsil Rajgarh District Alwar.
1D. Uganti D/o Badri Prasad Minor Through Bali Mother Khud R/o Village Raini, Tehsil Rajgarh District Alwar.
1E. Bane Singh S/o Badri Prasad, Minor Through Bali Mother Khud Mu. Golab Beba Badiri Prasad, R/o Village Raini, Tehsil Rajgarh District Alwar.
2.
Bhawan Sahay S/o Suwalal, R/o Village Raini, Tehsil Rajgarh District Alwar.
3.
Buddha Ram S/o Suwalal, R/o Village Raini, Tehsil Rajgarh District Alwar.
4.
Radheyshyam S/o Ramkaran, R/o Boochpuri, Tehsil Rajgarh, District Alwar Rajasthan.
5.
Ramkaran S/o Bala Ram, R/o Boochpuri, Tehsil Rajgarh, District Alwar Rajasthan.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Mukesh Kumar Saini
For Respondent(s)
:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
19/03/2026
1. Matter comes up on an application (CMCC No.1978/2024) filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, for condonation of delay in filing the restoration application.
[2026:RJ-JP:11847] (2 of 2) [CRES-994/2024]
2. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. Delay in filing the restoration application, is condoned.
3. Heard on restoration application.
4. The instant application has been filed for restoration of S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.1170/2020, which was dismissed in default by this Court vide order dated 14.02.2024.
5. Learned counsel for the applicant-appellant submits that earlier, Mr. Naval Singh Sikarwar was engaged as counsel in the miscellaneous appeal but unfortunately, he expired during pendency of the appeal, therefore, no one could appear before the Court to argue the matter on the date fixed for hearing and the miscellaneous appeal was dismissed in default vide order dated 14.02.2024 passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court.
6. Learned counsel for the applicant-appellant further submits that the applicant wants to contest the appeal on merits, therefore, the application be allowed and the appeal be restored to its original number.
7. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.1170/2020 is restored to its original number.
8. Office to proceed. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J SAHIL SONI /44