Rajasthan High Court
CMA/4869/2015 of RAMESHWAR MEENA AND ANOTHER Vs SALIMUDDIN AND OTHERS on 19 March 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 4869/2015 1. Rameshwar Meena S/o Late Shri Dev Narayan, aged about 50 years. 2. Smt. Shakuntala Meena wife of Rameshwar Meena, aged about 45 years, both are resident of House No.5, Meena Colony, Kailashpuri, Tonk Road,
[2026:RJ-JP:11838]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 4869/2015
1. Rameshwar Meena S/o Late Shri Dev Narayan, aged about 50 years.
2. Smt. Shakuntala Meena wife of Rameshwar Meena, aged about 45 years, both are resident of House No.5, Meena Colony, Kailashpuri, Tonk Road, Jaipur (Raj.)
----Appellants-Claimants
Versus
1. Salimuddin S/o Indu Khan, R/o Ked Udaipurwati, Jhunjhunu (Raj.) (Driver of Tanker No.RJ-14-GD-6662)
2. Mohan Lal S/o Babu Lal Sharma, R/o House No.39/5, Residence Area, Sardar Patel Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur (Raj.)
(Owner of Tanker No.RJ-14-GD-6662)
3. The New India Insurance Company Limited, through Manager, Jeevan Jyoti L.I.C. Building, Subhash Ngar, Shopping Centre, Shastri Nagar, Jaipur. (Insurance Company of Tanker No.RJ-14-GD-6662)
(Policy
No.3312003110200006400)
----Respondents-Non-Claimants
For Appellant(s)
:
Mr. Sandeep Sharma
For Respondent(s)
:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
19/03/2026
1. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that in spite of best efforts, he is not getting any instructions from the appellants to enable him to pursue the appeal.
2. Accordingly, the present civil miscellaneous appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
3. The appellants shall be at liberty to move an application for revival of the appeal, in case cause of action still survives. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J AVINASH GULERIA /1