Rajasthan High Court

CRES/131/2026 of SMT. GITA DEVI Vs SHAILENDRA SINGH S/O SHRI POONARAM, on 13 March 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 131/2026 in S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 3643/2017 1. Smt. Gita Devi, Aged About 42 Years, W/o Late Shri Sayarsingh, 2. Kumari Tara, Aged About 19 Years, D/o Late Shri Sayarsingh, 3. Kumari Gekha Devi, Aged About 17

[2026:RJ-JP:10803]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 131/2026

in

S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 3643/2017

1.

Smt. Gita Devi, Aged About 42 Years, W/o Late Shri Sayarsingh,

2.

Kumari Tara, Aged About 19 Years, D/o Late Shri Sayarsingh,

3.

Kumari Gekha Devi, Aged About 17 Years, D/o Late Shri Sayarsingh,

4.

Kumari Mansha Devi, Aged About 16 Years, D/o Late Shri Sayarsingh,

5.

Master Ganesh, Aged About 15 Years, S/o Late Shri Sayarsingh,

6.

Master Manoj S/o Late Shri Sayarsingh, Aged About 13

Years,

All R/o Village Rawatkheda, P.s. Thanwla, District Nagore, (Raj.)

Minor Petitioner 3 To 6 Are Represented Through Natural Guardian Mother Petitioner No. 1.

----Petitioners

Versus

1.

Shailendra Singh S/o Shri Poonaram, Aged About 28

Years, R/o Village Rawatkheda, P.s. Thanwla, District Nagore.(Driver Of Vehicle Pickup No. Rj 21 Ga 2642).

2.

Poorn Singh S/o Shri Poonaram, Aged About 32 Years, R/

o Village Rawatkheda, P.s. Thanwla, District Nagore, (Registered Owner Of Vehicle).

3.

Magma H.D. General Insurance Company Ltd., Through Senior Manager Magma House, 24, Park Street, Calcutta- 700016 (Insurance Co. Of Vehicle).

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Prashant Tada for

Mr. Akshat Chaudhary

For Respondent(s)

:

[2026:RJ-JP:10803]

(2 of 2)

[CRES-131/2026]

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

13/03/2026 This application is filed for restoration of the Civil Misc. Appeal. The civil Misc. Appeal was dismissed vide order dated 11.07.2025 passed by the Registrar (Judicial) in compliance of peremptory order dated 29.04.2025 passed by this Court. For the reasons mentioned therein, the application is allowed and the Civil Misc. Appeal is restored to its original number, subject to applicant-appellant filing the requisite PF & Notices for respondent No. 3 within a period of four weeks. In case of failure to do the needful, this order shall stand revoked without further reference to the Court. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J SKS/60

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead