Rajasthan High Court

CMAP/234/2018 of NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED Vs USHA RANI W/O LATE TEJ SINGH on 10 March 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 234/2018 National Insurance Company Limited, Through Branch Manager, 10 Narayan Singh Circle, Jaipur (Rajasthan) State Of Rajasthan. ----Applicant-Petitioner Versus 1. Usha Rani W/o Late Tej Singh, Aged About 48

[2026:RJ-JP:10272]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 234/2018

National Insurance Company Limited, Through Branch Manager, 10 Narayan Singh Circle, Jaipur (Rajasthan) State Of Rajasthan.

----Applicant-Petitioner

Versus

1.

Usha Rani W/o Late Tej Singh, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Village Hinota, Tehsil Maniya, District Dholpur (Raj.).

2.

Rubi D/o Late Tej Singh, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Village Hinota, Tehsil Maniya, District Dholpur (Raj.)

3.

Ripesh S/o Late Tej Singh, R/o Village Hinota, Tehsil Maniya, District Dholpur (Raj.)

4.

Raju S/o Late Tej Singh, Claimant -Respondent No. 3 And 4 Are Minor Through Her Natural Guardian Mother Usha Rani W/o Late Tej Singh, R/o Village Hinota, Tehsil Maniya, District Dholpur (Raj.)

5.

Kashan Devi W/o Shri Ram Khiladi, R/o Village Hinota, Tehsil Maniya, District Dholpur (Raj.)

6.

Vacha Ram S/o Shri Neksiya, R/o Village Birayi, Post Birayi, Police Station Saiya, District Agra (Uttar Pradesh).

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Dheeraj Singhal

For Respondent(s)

:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

10/03/2026

1. Learned counsel for the applicant-petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present miscellaneous application with liberty to take appropriate remedy in accordance with law.

2. Permission, as sought for, is granted.

3. With the aforesaid liberty, the instant application is dismissed as withdrawn. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J SAHIL SONI /48

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead