Rajasthan High Court
CRES/100/2026 of URMILA W/O LATE SHRI RAKESH, Vs HUKAM SINGH SON OF SHRI KISHAN SINGH, on 10 March 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 100/2026 In S. B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.3848/2017 1. Urmila W/o Late Shri Rakesh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Bandha, P.S. And Tehsil Deeg, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan. 2. Abhijeet Son Of Late Shri Rakesh,
[2026:RJ-JP:10240]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 100/2026
In
S. B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.3848/2017
1.
Urmila W/o Late Shri Rakesh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Bandha, P.S. And Tehsil Deeg, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan.
2.
Abhijeet Son Of Late Shri Rakesh, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Village Bandha, P.S. And Tehsil Deeg, District Bharat- pur, Rajasthan.
3.
Sukhdarshan Son Of Shri Bhagmal, Aged About 59 Years, R/o Village Bandha, P.S. And Tehsil Deeg, District Bharat- pur, Rajasthan.
4.
Shanti Devi W/o Sukhdarshan, Aged About 57 Years, R/o Village Bandha, P.s. And Tehsil Deeg, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan.
5.
Mamta D/o Sukhdarshan, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Vil- lage Bandha, P.s. And Tehsil Deeg, District Bharatpur, Ra- jasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
1.
Hukam Singh Son Of Shri Kishan Singh, Resident Of Sa- hahpur, Tehsil And P.s. Deeg, District Bharatpur.(Owner Of Vehicle Tractor No. Rj-05-Ra-9241).
2.
Rohan Singh Son Of Shri Hakim Singh, Resident Of Tam- rauli, P.s. Udhyog Nagar, Bharatpur. (Driver Of Vehicle Tractor No. Rj-05-Ra-9241).
3.
Shri Ram General Insurance Company Limited, Through Regional Manager, Shriram General Insurance Company Limited, 10003E-Riico, Industrial Area, Sitapura, Jaipur (Raj.) (Insurance Company Of Vehicle Tractor No. Rj-05- Ra-9241).
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Anshul Sharma
For Respondent(s)
:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
10/03/2026
[2026:RJ-JP:10240] (2 of 2) [CRES-100/2026] This application is filed for restoration of the civil misc. ap- peal. The civil misc. appeal was dismissed for non-compliance of the order dated 09.07.2025 passed by this Court and the order dated 22.08.2025 passed by the Registrar (Judicial). For the reasons mentioned therein, the application is allowed and the civil misc. appeal be restored to its original number, subject to the applicant-appellant filing the requisite extra set for service upon respondents within a period of four weeks. In case of failure to do the needful, the restoration order passed today shall stand revoked without reference to the Court. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J TN/55